It’s in our human nature to have the thought of death in our minds, and the way we depict death also connects with the scene of a dead animal, human, bird or flies. So, what’s the connection between all of them, but we didn’t think of it before? The smell.
According to recent studies, the human nose is capable to sense a wide range of smells, that cannot place them into any known category, but is still reacting to them. Such as the scent produced by a chemical called putrescine. This is a chemical that the body produces when it starts to decay, and one little thing to know, the scent is the result of the animal’s necrophobic behavior throughout the years of evolution, and these responses are thought to have evolved at least 420 million years ago.
The animals are thought that they react to the smell of putrescine as a sense of danger in a two different ways: the reaction that a predator is nearby, and the second is that they have been put in a life danger, so their instinct tells them to escape.
Scientists have made four different experiments on humans with a mixture of putrescine, water and ammonia, just to prove that human’s reactions and behavior are not any different than those of the animals.
The first experiment, where participants were tested to the scent of putrescine, as they were exposed to the scent of it and tested out their vigilance. The results showed that the participants who were exposed to the scent of putrescine showed more vigilance than those who were exposed to ammonia and water.
The researches did the second test where they have tested unsuspecting group of people, who were given a task to rate a smell on it’s intensity, repugnance and familiarity. The researches wanted to see the group’s reaction to the smells, and how fast the participants would walk away at an 80m distance. Those who have smelled the putrescine, tended to walk away more quickly from the place, which proved that the smell evoked a strong motive to escape.
In another experiment, after the group being exposed to the scent of putrescine, the researchers gave the participants a word stem-completion task.
The results have shown that the smell of putrescine caused the group to complete the word stems, all realted with escape and other associations with the word escape. The smell also increased to use of thread words.
Defensiveness and hostility
The last experiment the participants were exposed to a very decent scent that they couldn’t detect. In this experiment, they were given a text to read, and the task was to evaluate the author of it.
They were not able to detect the subtle smell of the putrescine, the participants showed defensiveness and hostility to the author. This also proved that the non-conscious exposure to the smell evoked a defensive behavior in the participants.
The study proved that people are affected by the smell of putrescine, the chemical that’s released in a decaying body, both consciously and subconsciously. We are affected by it, we can detect it, smell it. And, most importantly, we react to it, as the smell of death, trying to escape it or avoid it. Maybe we consciously do not know it as the smell of decaying body, but our instincts work it out as the smell of death. Interesting, huh?
Science Explains What Happens To Your Soul When You Pass Away
There are few things that fit the bill of fascinating, thought-provoking, and frightening. Death is one such thing.
Since the dawn of mankind, human beings have pondered the question “What happens after we die?” When you stop and think it, you quickly realize there are only two possible answers: something or nothing.
Of course, religion adds some nuance to the abovementioned question, but that’s pretty much it. Either something happens, or nothing happens. Either we are matter to be disposed of and recycled – or we aren’t.
Which one is it?
Well, if you were to ask Dr. Stuart Hameroff, something happens – and it involves consciousness.
SCIENTISTS REVEAL WHAT HAPPENS TO YOUR SOUL AFTER DEATH
What is consciousness?
The word ‘consciousness’ is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as:
– the state of being awake and aware of one’s surroundings.
– the awareness of perception of something by a person.
– the fact of awareness by the mind of itself and the world.
Predictably, consciousness – like death – is heavily debated. Some believe that consciousness is the direct result of brain activity. Others think that outside forces, e.g., the ‘Universe,’ ‘God’ – and internal elements, e.g., the ‘Spirit,’ ‘Lifeforce,’ ‘Mind,’ etc., contributes to our state of being.
THE ORCH-OR THEORY
Dr. Hameroff oversees the Center of Consciousness Studies at the University of Arizona and has spent the last 50-plus years exploring consciousness as it relates to the field of quantum mechanics.
Quantum mechanics is “a fundamental theory in physics which describes nature at the smallest scales of energy levels of atoms and subatomic particles.”
To explain just how essential quantum mechanics is to the perception of reality – and to Hameroff’s theory– let’s quickly talk about where it all began: The “Double-Slit Experiment.”
(We’ll get back to Orch-OR in a bit!)
THE DOUBLE-SLIT EXPERIMENT
Every quantum physicist is baffled by the double-slit experiment. And they have good reason to be –it defies natural law.
Here’s all you need to know about the experiment:
– Light particles called photons pass through two slits (hence the name).
– Photons, as researchers predict, form an ordered pattern on a wall. (To help you visualize this, imagine two vertical lines filled with little ‘pellet protons’ shooting onto a screen.)
– When an observational device (a detector) is set up to detect which protons go through which slit, no pattern emerges (no more vertically-aligned pellet protons).
– In other words, human observation (via a technical apparatus) alters the pattern.
– The predicted energy pattern, as should be decided by natural law, instead produces no pattern whatsoever.
Anil Ananthaswamy of New Scientist – in a piece called “Classic quantum experiment could conceal theory of everything” explains the experiment and potential ramifications:
“Our classical view of the world suggests that photons of light should pass through one slit or the other, and thus create two parallel bands on the screen behind. But instead, the light spreads out onto alternating bands of light and dark … (the) iconic physics experiment may be hiding more than we ever realized about the nature of reality.”
What do the human mind and the Universe have in common?
The answer: two things.
(1) We know relatively little about them.
(2) Quantum vibrations are found in both.
Read that again. It’s important.
While the phrase “correlation does not imply causation” is played on a loop within the scientific community (for a good reason, BTW), there is no denying the relationship between the human mind and universe.
But what is that relationship, exactly?
Back to ‘Orch-OR’
In 1996, Dr. Hameroff and Roger Penrose, mathematician and physicist, proposed the orchestrated objective reduction theory of consciousness, or the ‘Orch-OR’ theory.
According the Orch-OR theory, consciousness derives itself from tiny protein structures within the brain called microtubules.
On a physiological level, microtubules are described as the cell’s “conveyor belts,” transporting cellular resources and materials. Microtubules are also involved in cell division and the structuring of cells.
Microtubules also contain quantum energy.
“The origin of consciousness reflects our place in the universe, the nature of our existence. Did consciousness evolve from complex computations among brain neurons, as most scientists assert? Or has consciousness, in some sense, been here all along, as spiritual approaches maintain?”
Hamer off and Penrose answer their own rhetorical question:
“… our theory accommodates both these views, suggesting consciousness derives from quantum vibrations in microtubules, protein polymers inside brain neurons, which both govern neuronal and synaptic function, and connect brain processes to self-organizing processes in the fine scale, ‘proto-conscious’ quantum structure of reality.”
Bear in mind that the duo published their findings over twenty years ago. Since then, numerous technological advances (e.g., brain imaging and observational apparatuses) have taken place which appears to support Hameroff and Penrose’s theory.
Arch-OR and Death
The law of conservation of energy, resoundingly accepted by scientists, states that “energy can neither be created nor destroyed.”
Energy, however, can change forms.
The energy within us must change forms. It’s the ‘law.’
Quantum energy is the fundamental building block of the universe.
Quantum energy is found within us.
Are we creations of the Universe?
Do we simply ‘go home’ after shedding our bodily form, as Hamerof and Penrose seem to suggest?
Food for thought!